Denn v. Tatem

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Denn v. Tatem

1 N.J.L. 164

DecidedMay 15, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.J.L. 164 (Denn v. Tatem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Denn v. Tatem, 1 N.J.L. 164 (N.J. 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chief Justice

was desirous that the jury should be struck in Term before all the Justices which would obviate the objection-to himself personally, and put an end to the dilemma arising from the conflicting notices.

Leake refused this, and the Chief Justice overruled the second objection saying that it was not a legal one, and that it had been so determined by the court repeatedly. It \vas then agreed to defer this business until May term, and now—

The facts above mentioned being stated to the court they recommended to Chief Justice to strike the jury which he did.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chief Justice

was desirous that the jury should be struck in Term before all the Justices which would obviate the objection-to himself personally, and put an end to the dilemma arising from the conflicting notices.

Leake refused this, and the Chief Justice overruled the second objection saying that it was not a legal one, and that it had been so determined by the court repeatedly. It \vas then agreed to defer this business until May term, and now—

The facts above mentioned being stated to the court they recommended to Chief Justice to strike the jury which he did.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.J.L. 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denn-v-tatem-nj-1793.