Denn v. Driver & Tatem

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Denn v. Driver & Tatem

1 N.J.L. 109

DecidedNovember 15, 1791

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.J.L. 109 (Denn v. Driver & Tatem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Denn v. Driver & Tatem, 1 N.J.L. 109 (N.J. 1791).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Cur.

The causes were noticed for trial, first in May

last, by the plaintiffs^ second in September last by defendants: they went off on the ground of absent witnesses; but this term the plaintiffs have not noticed the causes. For this reason, the rules to stay waste must be discharged. One ground of defence in these causes, was, that the deed on which plaintiffs claimed, was a forgery. The counsel for the defendants moved for leave to inspect it; which was ordered, and that it should be left for that purpose 3 months in the hands of the Chief Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cur.

The causes were noticed for trial, first in May

last, by the plaintiffs^ second in September last by defendants: they went off on the ground of absent witnesses; but this term the plaintiffs have not noticed the causes. For this reason, the rules to stay waste must be discharged. One ground of defence in these causes, was, that the deed on which plaintiffs claimed, was a forgery. The counsel for the defendants moved for leave to inspect it; which was ordered, and that it should be left for that purpose 3 months in the hands of the Chief Justice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.J.L. 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denn-v-driver-tatem-nj-1791.