Denn v. Driver & Tatem

1 N.J.L. 109
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 1791·Published

Opinion

Per Cur.

The causes were noticed for trial, first in May

last, by the plaintiffs^ second in September last by defendants: they went off on the ground of absent witnesses; but this term the plaintiffs have not noticed the causes. For this reason, the rules to stay waste must be discharged. One ground of defence in these causes, was, that the deed on which plaintiffs claimed, was a forgery. The counsel for the defendants moved for leave to inspect it; which was ordered, and that it should be left for that purpose 3 months in the hands of the Chief Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Denn v. Driver & Tatem, 1 N.J.L. 109 (N.J. 1791).

1 N.J.L. 109 (Denn v. Driver & Tatem) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.