Denmark v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Denmark v. Singletary

722 So. 2d 969, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 57, 1999 WL 2688

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 6, 1999

DocketNo. 98-0828

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 722 So. 2d 969 (Denmark v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Denmark v. Singletary, 722 So. 2d 969, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 57, 1999 WL 2688 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accept appellant’s position that his earlier gain time litigation did not concern challenges to forfeited gain time associated with Counts II and III and therefore was not barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Nevertheless, we affirm the trial court’s order that dismissed appellant’s mandamus petition as the record does not demonstrate the appellant exhausted his administrative remedies in connection with such claim. Our af-firmance is without prejudice for appellant to pursue this claim in the proper forum.

GUNTHER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur. POLEN, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We accept appellant’s position that his earlier gain time litigation did not concern challenges to forfeited gain time associated with Counts II and III and therefore was not barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Nevertheless, we affirm the trial court’s order that dismissed appellant’s mandamus petition as the record does not demonstrate the appellant exhausted his administrative remedies in connection with such claim. Our af-firmance is without prejudice for appellant to pursue this claim in the proper forum.

GUNTHER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur. POLEN, J., dissents without opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

722 So. 2d 969, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 57, 1999 WL 2688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denmark-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack