Denmark v. Sheetz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Denmark v. Sheetz

230 A.D. 750

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 230 A.D. 750 (Denmark v. Sheetz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Denmark v. Sheetz, 230 A.D. 750 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to $2,500, in which event the judgment is so modified and as modified judgment and order are affirmed, with costs. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman and Whitmyer, JJ., concur; Hill, J., dissents and votes for affirmance; Hasbrouek, J., dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial on the ground that there is no evidence that the plaintiff suffered any injury to his sacro iliac joint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to $2,500, in which event the judgment is so modified and as modified judgment and order are affirmed, with costs. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman and Whitmyer, JJ., concur; Hill, J., dissents and votes for affirmance; Hasbrouek, J., dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial on the ground that there is no evidence that the plaintiff suffered any injury to his sacro iliac joint.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 A.D. 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denmark-v-sheetz-nyappdiv-1930.