Home/New York Supreme Court/Denmark v. New York Telephone Co.

Denmark v. New York Telephone Co.

103 Misc. 2d 1055, 442 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1980 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2252
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 11, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 103 Misc. 2d 1055 (Denmark v. New York Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Denmark v. New York Telephone Co., 103 Misc. 2d 1055, 442 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1980 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2252 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1980).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed.

The mistakes committed by the Telephone Company employees in disconnecting plaintiffs telephone did not reach the [1056]*1056level of gross negligence or willful misconduct required to create liability under the tariff provisions filed with the New York Public Service Commission. (Hamilton Employment Serv. v New York Tel. Co., 253 NY 468; Long Is. Cent. Sta. v New York Tel. Co., 54 AD2d 893; Warren v New York Tel. Co., 70 Misc 2d 794; Eisner v New York Tel. Co., 67 Misc 2d 506; see, also, 58A NY Jur, Telecommunications, §§ 63, 64.)

Concur: Buschmann, P. J., Kirsch and Jones, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. CCT Communications, Inc. (In Re CCT Communications, Inc.)
464 B.R. 97 (S.D. New York, 2011)
Veals v. Consolidated Edison Co.
114 Misc. 2d 626 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 Misc. 2d 1055, 442 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1980 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denmark-v-new-york-telephone-co-nysupct-1980.