Denmark v. New York Telephone Co.

New York Supreme Court

Denmark v. New York Telephone Co.

103 Misc. 2d 1055, 442 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1980 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2252

New York Supreme Court·Decided January 11, 1980·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed.

The mistakes committed by the Telephone Company employees in disconnecting plaintiffs telephone did not reach the [1056] level of gross negligence or willful misconduct required to create liability under the tariff provisions filed with the New York Public Service Commission. (Hamilton Employment Serv. v New York Tel. Co., 253 NY 468; Long Is. Cent. Sta. v New York Tel. Co., 54 AD2d 893; Warren v New York Tel. Co., 70 Misc 2d 794; Eisner v New York Tel. Co., 67 Misc 2d 506; see, also, 58A NY Jur, Telecommunications, §§ 63, 64.)

Concur: Buschmann, P. J., Kirsch and Jones, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed.

The mistakes committed by the Telephone Company employees in disconnecting plaintiffs telephone did not reach the [1056] level of gross negligence or willful misconduct required to create liability under the tariff provisions filed with the New York Public Service Commission. (Hamilton Employment Serv. v New York Tel. Co., 253 NY 468; Long Is. Cent. Sta. v New York Tel. Co., 54 AD2d 893; Warren v New York Tel. Co., 70 Misc 2d 794; Eisner v New York Tel. Co., 67 Misc 2d 506; see, also, 58A NY Jur, Telecommunications, §§ 63, 64.)

Concur: Buschmann, P. J., Kirsch and Jones, JJ.

Denmark v. New York Telephone Co., 103 Misc. 2d 1055, 442 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1980 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2252 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1980).

Pincite

103 Misc. 2d 1055 (Denmark v. New York Telephone Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related