Denlinger v. Rios
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
ADAM DENLINGER,
Plaintiff, Case No. 2:24-cv-10452
v. Honorable Susan K. DeClercq United States District Judge DAVID RIOS, et al., Honorable David R. Grand Defendants. United States Magistrate Judge _________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 17) AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (ECF No. 15)
On November 8, 2024, Magistrate Judge David R Grand issued a report recommending that this Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment. ECF No. 17. Judge Grand provided 14 days to object, but the parties did not do so. They have therefore forfeited their right to appeal Judge Grand’s findings. See Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530–31 (6th Cir. 2019) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). Moreover, there is no prejudicial clear error in the report. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 17, is ADOPTED. Further, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 15, is DENIED. /s/Susan K. DeClercq SUSAN K. DeCLERCQ Dated: 12/4/2024 United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Denlinger v. Rios (Denlinger v. Rios) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.