Denkewalter v. Wilson

78 N.E. 1049, 39 Ind. App. 289, 1906 Ind. App. LEXIS 136
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 24, 1906
DocketNo. 5,832
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 78 N.E. 1049 (Denkewalter v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Denkewalter v. Wilson, 78 N.E. 1049, 39 Ind. App. 289, 1906 Ind. App. LEXIS 136 (Ind. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

Roby, J.

Appellees brought this action alleging that the appellants were indebted to them in the sum of $500 for legal services, a bill of particulars of which was filed therewith.

The only error insisted upon is based upon the action of the trial court in sustaining appellees’ motion to strike out the third paragraph of answer. The assignment of [290]*290error is joint, both appellants joining therein. The judgment appealed from is against appellant Frederick W. Denkewalter, and his coappellant is not a party thereto. The party against whom no judgment is rendered cannot have been injured by the action of the court as above indicated. The assignment not being good as to both, is good as to neither. Bush v. McBride (1903), 159 Ind. 663.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Huntingburg v. State Ex Rel. Olinger
145 N.E. 443 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 N.E. 1049, 39 Ind. App. 289, 1906 Ind. App. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denkewalter-v-wilson-indctapp-1906.