Denke-Walter v. Loeper

42 N.E. 358, 142 Ind. 657, 1895 Ind. LEXIS 222
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 10, 1895
DocketNo. 17,428
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 42 N.E. 358 (Denke-Walter v. Loeper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Denke-Walter v. Loeper, 42 N.E. 358, 142 Ind. 657, 1895 Ind. LEXIS 222 (Ind. 1895).

Opinion

Monks, J.

Ida M. Loeper, one of appellees, brought this action against her co-appellees and appellant to quiet title to real estate.

Cross-complaints were filed by certain of the appellees to quiet title to a part of the same real estate.

The cause was tried and judgment rendered quieting the title to said real estate, as prayed for in the complaint and in the cross-complaint. Judgment was also rendered against appellants, Mary O. Denke-Walter and Frederick W. Denke-Walter (who is made an appellee in this court) for costs.

It is settled law in this State that all joint-judgment defendants in the court below must be made co-appellants in this court in all vacation appeals or the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Acts 1895, p. 17 9 ; Elliott App. Proced., section 144; Inman v. Vogel, 141 Ind. 138, and cases cited; Walsh v. Brockway, 13 Ind. App. 70.

There can be but one appeal from the same judgment, and when the same is not a term time appeal all co-parties entitled to- appeal must be joined as co-appellants. Acts 1895, p. 179 ; Inman v. Vogel, supra; Gregory v. Smith, 139 Ind. 48, and cases cited.

The appeal in this case was not a term time appeal and is not therefore governed hy the provisions of the acts approved March 9, 1895. Acts 1895, p. 179.

Frederick W. Denke-Walter was a co-party and joint-judgment defendant with appellant in the court below, and should have been made co-appellant in this court. This not having been done the appeal must be dismissed. Gregory v. Smith, supra; Inman v. Vogel, supra, and cases cited; Midland R. W. Co. v. St. Clair, 42 N. E. Rep. 214.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaw v. Garrett
108 N.E. 536 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1915)
Hubbard v. Burnet-Lewis Lumber Co.
98 N.E. 1011 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1912)
Continental Insurance v. Gue
98 N.E. 147 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1912)
Brown v. Sullivan
63 N.E. 302 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1902)
Smith v. Fairfield
61 N.E. 560 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1901)
Everett v. Fouts
60 N.E. 454 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1901)
Owen v. Dresback
56 N.E. 22 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1900)
Anderson Glass Co. v. Brakeman
47 N.E. 937 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1897)
Stults v. Gibler
45 N.E. 340 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1896)
Lowe v. Turpie
44 N.E. 25 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1896)
Shuman v. Collis
43 N.E. 257 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 N.E. 358, 142 Ind. 657, 1895 Ind. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denke-walter-v-loeper-ind-1895.