Denk v. Holder
This text of Denk v. Holder (Denk v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1796
RAYMOND ALLAN DENK,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: November 17, 2010 Decided: November 30, 2010
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Allan Denk, Petitioner Pro Se. Daniel Eric Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Eric Warren Marsteller, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Raymond Allan Denk, a native and citizen of Canada,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration
judge’s decisions finding him removable as an aggravated felon,
finding him statutorily ineligible for adjustment of status, and
ordering his removal to Canada. We have reviewed the record and
the Board’s order and deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. In re: Denk (B.I.A. June 11,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Denk v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denk-v-holder-ca4-2010.