Denison v. Department of Justice
193 P.3d 31, 222 Or. App. 318, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1197
Opinion
Petitioner in this proceeding has brought what this court has deemed to be a facial challenge to OAR 137-002-0020 pursuant to ORS 183.400. We have considered petitioner’s arguments that the rule exceeds the authority of the agency that promulgated it and that it was adopted in a manner inconsistent with ORS 183.335. Petitioner’s arguments lack merit, and a discussion of them would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public.
OAR 137-002-0020 held valid.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Denison v. Department of Justice, 193 P.3d 31, 222 Or. App. 318, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1197 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
193 P.3d 31 (Denison v. Department of Justice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. McFadden
193 P.3d 31 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)