Denison v. Department of Justice

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Denison v. Department of Justice

193 P.3d 31, 222 Or. App. 318, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1197

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 10, 2008

DocketA133180

StatusPublished

This text of 193 P.3d 31 (Denison v. Department of Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Denison v. Department of Justice, 193 P.3d 31, 222 Or. App. 318, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1197 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

*319 PER CURIAM

Petitioner in this proceeding has brought what this court has deemed to be a facial challenge to OAR 137-002-0020 pursuant to ORS 183.400. We have considered petitioner’s arguments that the rule exceeds the authority of the agency that promulgated it and that it was adopted in a manner inconsistent with ORS 183.335. Petitioner’s arguments lack merit, and a discussion of them would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public.

OAR 137-002-0020 held valid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*319 PER CURIAM

Petitioner in this proceeding has brought what this court has deemed to be a facial challenge to OAR 137-002-0020 pursuant to ORS 183.400. We have considered petitioner’s arguments that the rule exceeds the authority of the agency that promulgated it and that it was adopted in a manner inconsistent with ORS 183.335. Petitioner’s arguments lack merit, and a discussion of them would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public.

OAR 137-002-0020 held valid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 P.3d 31, 222 Or. App. 318, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denison-v-department-of-justice-orctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack