Denise v. Welch
This text of 242 A.D. 34 (Denise v. Welch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action against appellant was not commenced within the period required by section 71 of the Stock Corporation Law which is an integral part of the statute under which plaintiff is claiming the right of recovery. (Hill v. Supervisors of Rensselaer County, 119 N. Y. 344.) (See, also, Matter of Keep, 241 App. Div. -, decided herewith.) As to the sufficiency of the complaint so far as it relates to the character of the occupation of plaintiff’s assignors coming within the statute, we are bound by our former decision (239 App. Div. 805).
All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.
Judgment and order reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 34, 273 N.Y.S. 921, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denise-v-welch-nyappdiv-1934.