Denise v. Siegfeldt v. Virginia Employment Comm
This text of Denise v. Siegfeldt v. Virginia Employment Comm (Denise v. Siegfeldt v. Virginia Employment Comm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Baker, Willis and Overton Argued at Norfolk, Virginia
DENISE V. SIEGFELDT MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 2270-95-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON JUNE 11, 1996 VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF HAMPTON Walter J. Ford, Judge Denise V. Siegfeldt, pro se.
Cheryl A. Wilkerson, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General; Lisa J. Rowley, Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.
Denise V. Siegfeldt petitioned for a judicial review of a
decision from the Virginia Employment Commission. Because her
petition did not name a party required by the statute and was not
served within a reasonable time, the circuit court dismissed the
petition. Siegfeldt appeals from this order. We affirm.
"When the legislature has prescribed limitations within
which the right of appeal may be exercised, such limitations are
exclusive, and the court cannot modify or enlarge them without
express statutory authority." Blankenship v. Virginia
Unemployment Compensation Comm'n, 177 Va. 250, 254, 13 S.E.2d
409, 411 (1941). Upon review of the record, we find no
reversible error in the circuit court judge's ruling.
* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. Affirmed.
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Denise v. Siegfeldt v. Virginia Employment Comm, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denise-v-siegfeldt-v-virginia-employment-comm-vactapp-1996.