Denise v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Denise v. New York City Transit Authority

96 A.D.3d 561, 946 N.Y.S.2d 469

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 19, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A.D.3d 561 (Denise v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Denise v. New York City Transit Authority, 96 A.D.3d 561, 946 N.Y.S.2d 469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered July 22, 2009, which reversed an order of the Civil Court, Bronx County (Francis M. Alessandro, J.), entered on or about May 7, 2007, granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Because defendant New York City Transit Authority’s obligation to provide no-fault benefits arises out of the no-fault statute, the three-year statute of limitations as set forth in CPLR 214 (2) bars plaintiffs claim (see M.N. Dental Diagnostics, P.C. v New York City Tr. Auth., 82 AD3d 409 [2011]).

We have reviewed plaintiff’s contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, DeGrasse, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 25 Misc 3d 13.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered July 22, 2009, which reversed an order of the Civil Court, Bronx County (Francis M. Alessandro, J.), entered on or about May 7, 2007, granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Because defendant New York City Transit Authority’s obligation to provide no-fault benefits arises out of the no-fault statute, the three-year statute of limitations as set forth in CPLR 214 (2) bars plaintiffs claim (see M.N. Dental Diagnostics, P.C. v New York City Tr. Auth., 82 AD3d 409 [2011]).

We have reviewed plaintiff’s contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, DeGrasse, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 25 Misc 3d 13.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.3d 561, 946 N.Y.S.2d 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denise-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack