Denise Miller v. John M. Henderson, M.D.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Denise Miller v. John M. Henderson, M.D.

DecidedMarch 31, 2017

Docket11-17-00017-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Denise Miller v. John M. Henderson, M.D. (Denise Miller v. John M. Henderson, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Denise Miller v. John M. Henderson, M.D., (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order filed March 31, 2017

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ____________

No. 11-17-00017-CV ____________

DENISE MILLER, Appellant V. JOHN M. HENDERSON, M.D., Appellee

On Appeal from the 441st District Court Midland County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV52184

ORDER Denise Miller has filed an unopposed motion to abate this interlocutory appeal. In the motion, Miller states that the parties are awaiting the trial court’s ruling on her request for a thirty-day extension of time in which to file a supplemental expert report. Miller also states that further hearings in the trial court may be needed and that this appeal should be abated in the interest of judicial economy. Counsel for the appellee does not oppose the motion to abate. The motion is granted, and the appeal is abated. The parties are instructed to notify this court immediately of any pertinent rulings made by the trial court, and the district clerk is directed to immediately provide this court with a supplemental clerk’s record containing any further orders of the trial court in this matter.

PER CURIAM

March 31, 2017 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order filed March 31, 2017

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ____________

No. 11-17-00017-CV ____________

DENISE MILLER, Appellant V. JOHN M. HENDERSON, M.D., Appellee

On Appeal from the 441st District Court Midland County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV52184

ORDER Denise Miller has filed an unopposed motion to abate this interlocutory appeal. In the motion, Miller states that the parties are awaiting the trial court’s ruling on her request for a thirty-day extension of time in which to file a supplemental expert report. Miller also states that further hearings in the trial court may be needed and that this appeal should be abated in the interest of judicial economy. Counsel for the appellee does not oppose the motion to abate. The motion is granted, and the appeal is abated. The parties are instructed to notify this court immediately of any pertinent rulings made by the trial court, and the district clerk is directed to immediately provide this court with a supplemental clerk’s record containing any further orders of the trial court in this matter.

PER CURIAM

March 31, 2017 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Denise Miller v. John M. Henderson, M.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denise-miller-v-john-m-henderson-md-texapp-2017.