DENISE LOPEZ v. AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK
This text of DENISE LOPEZ v. AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK (DENISE LOPEZ v. AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DENISE M. LOPEZ, Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK, d/b/a AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK Appellee.
No. 4D19-1079
[September 25, 2019]
Appeal of nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Janis Brustares Keyser, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2018-CA-013157.
Paul J. Carrier of WMU Cooley Law School, Riverview, for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The order denying Appellant’s motion to dismiss and quash service of process is summarily affirmed. Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). Appellant has failed to provide an adequate record to demonstrate reversible error. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979).
Affirmed.
MAY, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
DENISE LOPEZ v. AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denise-lopez-v-american-express-national-bank-fladistctapp-2019.