Denise Fowler v. Menard Inc
This text of Denise Fowler v. Menard Inc (Denise Fowler v. Menard Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 29, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
152519 Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein DENISE FOWLER, as Next Friend of Joan L. Larsen, VIRGINIA JANE RAWLUSZKI, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 152519 COA: 310890 Bay CC: 11-003317-NO MENARD, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 15, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order including, among the issues to be briefed, whether the crosswalk installed by the defendant had a special aspect that could create liability for even an open and obvious hazard, and whether such a special aspect can exist if the condition is not unreasonably dangerous. See Hoffner v Lanctoe, 492 Mich 450, 455 (2012); Lugo v Ameritech Corp, Inc, 464 Mich 512, 517 (2001). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 29, 2016 t0426 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Denise Fowler v. Menard Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denise-fowler-v-menard-inc-mich-2016.