Denis v. Murff
This text of 260 F.2d 955 (Denis v. Murff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record shows no adequate grounds for interference with the administrative proceedings for deportation of this petitioner. There is substantial evidence to support the finding of the Special Inquiry Officer and the Board of Immigration Appeals that petitioner engaged in prostitution, as well as their rejection of her assertion, as to the statement she gave an Immigration and Naturalization Service Investigator, that she did not understand the questions asked her and that prior to making the statement she had asked for and been denied an opportunity to consult with counsel.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 F.2d 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denis-v-murff-ca2-1958.