Denis v. Del Giudice v. United States

396 F.2d 600
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 5, 1968·No. 22075·Published

Opinion

396 F.2d 600

Denis V. DEL GIUDICE, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

Nos. 22075, 22075A.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 5, 1968.

Luke McKissack, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

William M. Byrne, Jr., U.S. Atty., Robert L. Brosio, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Criminal Division, Gabriel A. Gutterrez, Asst. U.S. Atty., Arthur A. Dickerman, Dept. of Health, Education & Welfare, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES, MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant stands convicted of sale (and possession for sale) of LSD-25 in violation of the 1965 amendments to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The sole question on appeal is the constitutionality of that Act with which question we have dealt in our opinion in Deyo v. United States, 9 Cir., 396 F.2d 595, filed this day. For the reasons there set forth, judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Denis v. Del Giudice v. United States, 396 F.2d 600 (9th Cir. 1968).

396 F.2d 600 (Denis v. Del Giudice v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dennis C. Deyo v. United States
396 F.2d 595 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)
Del Giudice v. United States
396 F.2d 600 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)