Denicia Roberts v. Mark Berry

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2025·No. 23-3231·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 23-3231

Denicia V. Roberts

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Mark Berry, Major General, individually and in his official capacity as Former Adjutant General of the Arkansas Military Department; Mark McKinnon, Individually and in his official capacity as a Departmental Supervisor in and for the Arkansas Military Department; Arkansas Military Department; Scott Stanger, Individually, and in his official capacity as a Quality Assurance/Policy Maker for the Arkansas Military Department; Michelle Young-Hobbs, Individually, and in her official capacity as the Human Resource Administrator for the Arkansas Military Department

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central

Submitted: February 7, 2025 Filed: February 28, 2025

[Unpublished]

Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Denicia Roberts appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment discrimination action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper. See Collins v. Kansas City Mo. Pub. Sch. Dist., 92 F.4th 770, 771 (8th Cir. 2024) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1 The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Denicia Roberts v. Mark Berry, (8th Cir. 2025).

Denicia Roberts v. Mark Berry (Denicia Roberts v. Mark Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related