Denham v. Watkins
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION
COS O. DENHAM,
Plaintiff,
v. CAUSE NO. 3:23-CV-149-CWR-LGI US NAVY RECRUITER JOHN WATKINS, US NAVY RECRUITER MATTHEW OLSEN,
Defendants.
ORDER
On January 10, 2025, this Court entered an Order denying Denham’s request to reopen this case. See Docket No. 86. Since then, Denham has filed several pleadings and requests. He persists with his filings in this closed case and has submitted over a dozen documents in an attempt to relitigate his case. See Docket Nos. 87–101. Each is unavailing. Denham’s employment discrimination claim has been dismissed, and his request for reconsideration has been denied. This remains a closed case. Therefore, the Court will terminate the pending motions. Denham is cautioned that future frivolous or repetitive filings may subject him to the appropriate sanctions. See Carson v. Cain, No. 3:23-CV-178-DPJ-RPM, 2025 WL 1900015, at *1 (S.D. Miss. July 9, 2025) (“Federal Rule of Civil [P]rocedure 11(b)(1) gives the Court discretion to issue sanctions for abusive litigation practices.”); see also Potts v. Texas, 354 F. App’x 70, 71 (5th Cir. 2009). SO ORDERED, this the 8th day of August, 2025.
s/ Carlton W. Reeves UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Denham v. Watkins (Denham v. Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.