Denetclaw v. Gray

1 Navajo Rptr. 261
CourtNavajo Nation Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1978
DocketNo.: A-CV-22-77
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Navajo Rptr. 261 (Denetclaw v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navajo Nation Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Denetclaw v. Gray, 1 Navajo Rptr. 261 (navajo 1978).

Opinion

The Appeal in the above-entitled matter, filed the 20th day of December, 1977, having been received and considered pursuant to 7 N.T.C. Section 451, the Court finds:

1. Defendant was timely notified of the hearing in the above-entitled matter but failed to appear at the time set.
2. Defendant faded to timely file a motion for continuance in the matter as the motion was not filed until after the hearing.
3. Defendant's attorney should have known that the Clerk of the Court could not grant continuances .
4. A review of the District Court's records shows there are sufficient bases for granting a Judgment by Default,

[262]*262THEREFORE, the Appeal, in the. above-entitled matter is DISMISSED.

Dated this ?th day of March, 1978.

Homer Bluehouse Acting Chief Justice Of The Navajo Nation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Navajo Rptr. 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denetclaw-v-gray-navajo-1978.