Deneal O. Brown v. State of Florida

256 So. 3d 820
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 15, 2018·No. SC16-1031·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Brown v. State , 197 So.3d 69 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016), on the grounds of express and direct conflict with Griffin v. State , 160 So.3d 63 (Fla. 2015), Stinson v. State , 69 So.3d 291 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), and Ward v. State , 12 So.3d 920 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Having considered the Second District's opinion and the briefs of the parties, upon further review, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss review.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and LEWIS, POLSTON, LABARGA, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deneal O. Brown v. State of Florida, 256 So. 3d 820 (Fla. 2018).

256 So. 3d 820 (Deneal O. Brown v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ward v. State
12 So. 3d 920 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Steve Lawrence Griffin v. State of Florida
160 So. 3d 63 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2015)
Brown v. State
197 So. 3d 69 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Stinson v. State
69 So. 3d 291 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)