Dendy v. Dendy
This text of 89 S.E. 317 (Dendy v. Dendy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This appeal raises the question whether there was error on the part of the probate Judge in ordering that the will in *403 question be admitted to probate, in due form of law. The facts are stated in the decree, rendered by the probate Judge. By consent of all the parties, the case was heard by the Circuit Judge, upon the exceptions without a jury. The exceptions were overruled, and the decree confirmed, whereupon there was an appeal to this Court.
In the case of In re Solomon’s Estate, 74 S. C. 189, 54 S. E. 207, it was held that the issue of will or no will is legal in its nature, and the facts are not reviewable by this Court, on an appeal from the Circuit Court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 S.E. 317, 104 S.C. 399, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dendy-v-dendy-sc-1916.