Denbo v. Adams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Denbo v. Adams

158 P. 303, 158 P. 383, 60 Okla. 117, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1297

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided July 25, 1916·No. 6242·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

BURFORD, O.

The plaintiffs in ■error have filed their brief in accordance with the rules of this court. The defendant in error has filed no brief, although the same is long overdue. Under such circumstances we are not required to search the record for evidence to sustain the judgment of the trial court.

The allegations of the plaintiffs in error’s brief appear to fairly support the assignments of error, and the cause should therefore be reversed for further proceedings.

By the Court:. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

BURFORD, O.

The plaintiffs in ■error have filed their brief in accordance with the rules of this court. The defendant in error has filed no brief, although the same is long overdue. Under such circumstances we are not required to search the record for evidence to sustain the judgment of the trial court.

The allegations of the plaintiffs in error’s brief appear to fairly support the assignments of error, and the cause should therefore be reversed for further proceedings.

By the Court:. It is so ordered.

Denbo v. Adams, 158 P. 303, 158 P. 383, 60 Okla. 117, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1297 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

158 P. 303 (Denbo v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.