Denbo v. Adams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Denbo v. Adams

158 P. 303, 158 P. 383, 60 Okla. 117, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1297

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 25, 1916

Docket6242

StatusPublished

This text of 158 P. 303 (Denbo v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Denbo v. Adams, 158 P. 303, 158 P. 383, 60 Okla. 117, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1297 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

BURFORD, O.

The plaintiffs in ■error have filed their brief in accordance with the rules of this court. The defendant in error has filed no brief, although the same is long overdue. Under such circumstances we are not required to search the record for evidence to sustain the judgment of the trial court.

The allegations of the plaintiffs in error’s brief appear to fairly support the assignments of error, and the cause should therefore be reversed for further proceedings.

By the Court:. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

BURFORD, O.

The plaintiffs in ■error have filed their brief in accordance with the rules of this court. The defendant in error has filed no brief, although the same is long overdue. Under such circumstances we are not required to search the record for evidence to sustain the judgment of the trial court.

The allegations of the plaintiffs in error’s brief appear to fairly support the assignments of error, and the cause should therefore be reversed for further proceedings.

By the Court:. It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 P. 303, 158 P. 383, 60 Okla. 117, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denbo-v-adams-okla-1916.