Den v. Matlack

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Den v. Matlack

17 N.J.L. 354

DecidedNovember 15, 1839

StatusPublished

This text of 17 N.J.L. 354 (Den v. Matlack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Den v. Matlack, 17 N.J.L. 354 (N.J. 1839).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

This being a special motion, the plaintiff was entitled to two days notice: nor can we upon an ex-parie affidavit make an absolute rule in a case like this. Take a rule on the plaintiff to show cause on the first day of next term, why proceedings in this action should not be stayed, until the cause pending in the court of appeals shall be determined; and that all proceedings in this action be stayed in the mean time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

This being a special motion, the plaintiff was entitled to two days notice: nor can we upon an ex-parie affidavit make an absolute rule in a case like this. Take a rule on the plaintiff to show cause on the first day of next term, why proceedings in this action should not be stayed, until the cause pending in the court of appeals shall be determined; and that all proceedings in this action be stayed in the mean time.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 N.J.L. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/den-v-matlack-nj-1839.