Den v. . Love

61 N.C. 435
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 61 N.C. 435 (Den v. . Love) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Den v. . Love, 61 N.C. 435 (N.C. 1868).

Opinion

Reade, J.

Beforexthe Ordinance to change the jurisdiction of the Courts, &c., (23d June, 1866,) this suit would have abated by reason that two terms had elapsed after the defendant’s death without making his executor a party. But that ordinance provides that the time elapsed since 1st Sept. 1861, barring actions and suits, or presuming the satisfaction or abandonment of rights, shall not be counted. That ordinance prevented this suit from abating. We so held in Morris v. Avery, ante, 238. His Honor’s ruling in this case was before that decision.

There is error. Let this be certified, &c. ■

Per Curiam. There is error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Seaboard Air Line Railway
145 N.C. 570 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1907)
State v. . R. R.
59 S.E. 1048 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 N.C. 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/den-v-love-nc-1868.