Den v. Johnson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Den v. Johnson

13 N.J.L. 156

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 15, 1832·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

Both these points have been long and well [157]*157settled in this state. It has been repeatedly adjudged that one-party cannot recover from the other the costs of exemplifications or copies of judgments or„other documents used upon the-trial, nor can he recover the mileage of a witness until he enters the state by the ordinary route of travelling to the place of' trial. From that time he travels under the authority and by-virtue of the process of the court, and is entirled to mileage.

Retaxation accordingly..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Both these points have been long and well [157]*157settled in this state. It has been repeatedly adjudged that one-party cannot recover from the other the costs of exemplifications or copies of judgments or„other documents used upon the-trial, nor can he recover the mileage of a witness until he enters the state by the ordinary route of travelling to the place of' trial. From that time he travels under the authority and by-virtue of the process of the court, and is entirled to mileage.

Retaxation accordingly..

Den v. Johnson, 13 N.J.L. 156 (N.J. 1832).

Pincite

13 N.J.L. 156 (Den v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.