Den v. Huff

1 Thompson 24, 1 Shan. Cas. 8
Tennessee Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1847·Published·Cited by 46 cases

Opinion

Reese, J.:

The fact of several pleas docs not make several causes in any case but ejectment, and does not in that action necessarily. But where different questions are involved between different ■ parties upon different titles, it is proper in ejectment to sever the causes. The parties having recognized in this case a severance, and acquiesced in it, are bound by their acquiescence, and the taxation was hence proper. Each party will pay full costs.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Den v. Huff, 1 Thompson 24, 1 Shan. Cas. 8 (Tenn. 1847).

1 Thompson 24 (Den v. Huff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Louisiana v. Davieontray Lee Breaux
Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2025
Gonzalez v. Thompson
E.D. Washington, 2023
(PC) Harris v. Kyle
E.D. California, 2021
Estate of Carmen Del Fierro De Garcia
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010
Harbor Perfusion, Inc. v. Floyd
45 S.W.3d 713 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
People v. Bennett
501 N.W.2d 106 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1993)
Sheridan Road Baptist Church v. Department of Education
396 N.W.2d 373 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1986)
Strachan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
73 N.E.2d 840 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1947)
Delfelder v. Poston
293 P. 354 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1930)
McCargar v. Wiley
229 P. 665 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1924)
Shiatte v. Singer Manufacturing Co.
125 A. 429 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1924)
Williamson Investment Co. v. Williamson
165 P. 385 (Washington Supreme Court, 1917)
In re Keith Gara Co.
203 F. 585 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1913)
Steer v. Dow
71 A. 217 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1908)
Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Loughlin
98 S.W. 948 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1906)