Den v. Chapman

8 N.J.L. 216
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 15, 1825·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

The application must be made to the next term, but the re-taxation may be made at that or some [217]*217subsequent term according to circumstances. Notice of tbe application is not required by the act; but the court will take care that the one party shall not bo taken by surprise and the other shall not use the privilege of re-taxation for the purpose of delay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Den v. Chapman, 8 N.J.L. 216 (N.J. 1825).

8 N.J.L. 216 (Den v. Chapman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.