Den on the demise of Sandifer v. Foster
2 N.C. 271
This text of 2 N.C. 271 (Den on the demise of Sandifer v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Den on the demise of Sandifer v. Foster, 2 N.C. 271 (N.C. Ct. App. 1795).
Opinion
Per curiam,
after argument — the river in this case, must be considered as the boundary of Gee’s patent — it has always been thus uniformly decided in our courts.
The jury found accordingly, and there was judgment, accordingly' — Baker for Plaintiff, Keys for Defendant.
Note. — Vide Hartsfield v. Westbrook, post 258—note to Bradford v. Hill, ante 22.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 N.C. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/den-on-the-demise-of-sandifer-v-foster-ncsuperct-1795.