Den on the demise of Sandifer v. Foster

2 N.C. 271
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided October 15, 1795·Published

Opinion

Per curiam,

Williams and Haywood,

after argument — the river in this case, must be considered as the boundary of Gee’s patent — it has always been thus uniformly decided in our courts.

The jury found accordingly, and there was judgment, accordingly' — Baker for Plaintiff, Keys for Defendant.

Note. — Vide Hartsfield v. Westbrook, post 258—note to Bradford v. Hill, ante 22.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Den on the demise of Sandifer v. Foster, 2 N.C. 271 (N.C. Ct. App. 1795).

2 N.C. 271 (Den on the demise of Sandifer v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.