Den on the demise of Faircloth v. Ingraham

Superior Court of North Carolina

Den on the demise of Faircloth v. Ingraham

2 N.C. 577

DecidedSeptember 15, 1797

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.C. 577 (Den on the demise of Faircloth v. Ingraham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Den on the demise of Faircloth v. Ingraham, 2 N.C. 577 (N.C. Ct. App. 1797).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam

Williams and Haywood, Justices.—

The demise is a mere fiction — the jury are not sworn upon that, but to try the title only. It may be amended at any-time, or the exception may be overlooked, as it was in 2 Bur>\ 1159, where the demise after the trial was found to be laid upon a time not yef come. The nonsuit was refused.

Note. — Vide Young v. Erwin, ante 323. Adams on Eject. 203, 204,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam

Williams and Haywood, Justices.—

The demise is a mere fiction — the jury are not sworn upon that, but to try the title only. It may be amended at any-time, or the exception may be overlooked, as it was in 2 Bur>\ 1159, where the demise after the trial was found to be laid upon a time not yef come. The nonsuit was refused.

Note. — Vide Young v. Erwin, ante 323. Adams on Eject. 203, 204,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.C. 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/den-on-the-demise-of-faircloth-v-ingraham-ncsuperct-1797.