Den on Demise of Sanders v. Hyatt

8 N.C. 247
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1821·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Haex, Judge.

The clause in the will gives the land .over, if Lawrence should die without a lawfully begotten heir. Now he cannot die witiiout heir as long as tiie persons live to whom tiie ulterior limitation gives it upon the happening of that event; for they may become heirs at law after the death of others more nearly related. *248 The word heir, in the singular number, must therefore mean issue; and by that means the estate first given in fee is turned into an estate tail, and by the act of 1784, is converted into a fee-simple again in the first taker, The ulterior limitation is therefore void, and nothing passes by it.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Den on Demise of Sanders v. Hyatt, 8 N.C. 247 (N.C. 1821).

8 N.C. 247 (Den on Demise of Sanders v. Hyatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sharpe v. . Brown
98 S.E. 825 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)