Den on demise of Ducket v. Skinner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Den on demise of Ducket v. Skinner

33 N.C. 431

DecidedDecember 15, 1850

StatusPublished

This text of 33 N.C. 431 (Den on demise of Ducket v. Skinner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Den on demise of Ducket v. Skinner, 33 N.C. 431 (N.C. 1850).

Pincite

Opinion

Ruffin, C. J.

The case is very defectively stated: omitting, for example, to set forth, that the purchaser did or did not take a conveyance. But it is not material to advert to those considerations, since, supposing the best for the defendant on every thing not stated, it appears affirmatively, that his title is,essentially defective, by reason that the order for the sale was unauthorised and void The case of Leary v. Fletcher, 1 Ire. 259, is a direct au< thority to that point, and renders further discussion of the principle unnecessary.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruffin, C. J.

The case is very defectively stated: omitting, for example, to set forth, that the purchaser did or did not take a conveyance. But it is not material to advert to those considerations, since, supposing the best for the defendant on every thing not stated, it appears affirmatively, that his title is,essentially defective, by reason that the order for the sale was unauthorised and void The case of Leary v. Fletcher, 1 Ire. 259, is a direct au< thority to that point, and renders further discussion of the principle unnecessary.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 N.C. 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/den-on-demise-of-ducket-v-skinner-nc-1850.