Den on dem. Osborne v. Woodson

Superior Court of North Carolina

Den on dem. Osborne v. Woodson

2 N.C. 32

DecidedMarch 15, 1794

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.C. 32 (Den on dem. Osborne v. Woodson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Den on dem. Osborne v. Woodson, 2 N.C. 32 (N.C. Ct. App. 1794).

Pincite

Opinion

Note —On the first point, vide Adams on Eject. 22, according to Which it sefms that in England the word tenement is not sufficiently certain in an ejectment, though it does not appear that the English cases had the additional designation by metes and bounds, vide also Byrd v. Clark. 2 Car. Law Rep 622. As to the other points, vide Governor v. Carter & others, 3 Hawks 328—Act of 1820, Rev. ch. 1066, and the case of Pope v. Bradley, 3 Hawks 16, decided thereon.—Jones v. Fulgham, 2 Murph. 364.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Note —On the first point, vide Adams on Eject. 22, according to Which it sefms that in England the word tenement is not sufficiently certain in an ejectment, though it does not appear that the English cases had the additional designation by metes and bounds, vide also Byrd v. Clark. 2 Car. Law Rep 622. As to the other points, vide Governor v. Carter & others, 3 Hawks 328—Act of 1820, Rev. ch. 1066, and the case of Pope v. Bradley, 3 Hawks 16, decided thereon.—Jones v. Fulgham, 2 Murph. 364.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.C. 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/den-on-dem-osborne-v-woodson-ncsuperct-1794.