Den ex dem. Peterson v. Boqua

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Den ex dem. Peterson v. Boqua

10 N.J.L. 227

DecidedSeptember 15, 1828

StatusPublished

This text of 10 N.J.L. 227 (Den ex dem. Peterson v. Boqua) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Den ex dem. Peterson v. Boqua, 10 N.J.L. 227 (N.J. 1828).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The fact of insolvency, if we are authorized to extend the provision of the statute, on principles of equitable construction, is not sufficiently made out. Though insolvent in 1820, the time to which the affidavit relates, Sparks may be quite otherwise in 1827, when this suit was commenced. In a case reported in Penn. Rep. 866, this court overruled an application for security for costs, one of the several lessors of the plaintiff being a resident in the state.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The fact of insolvency, if we are authorized to extend the provision of the statute, on principles of equitable construction, is not sufficiently made out. Though insolvent in 1820, the time to which the affidavit relates, Sparks may be quite otherwise in 1827, when this suit was commenced. In a case reported in Penn. Rep. 866, this court overruled an application for security for costs, one of the several lessors of the plaintiff being a resident in the state.

Motion overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 N.J.L. 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/den-ex-dem-peterson-v-boqua-nj-1828.