Den ex dem. Ely v. Fen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Den ex dem. Ely v. Fen

12 N.J.L. 322

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 15, 1831·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

Let the judgment be set aside. Wall then stated, that the tenant in possession had been turned oat of possession by virtue of a writ of habere facias issued upon this judgment, and applied for a writ of restitution with costs.

[370]*370Hamilton insisted that the tenant ought not to have costs.

By the Court. Let the writ of restitution issue with costs. He who is thus illegally turned out of possession, should have costs.

Hamilton then applied for leave to amend the affidavit, which was granted by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Let the judgment be set aside. Wall then stated, that the tenant in possession had been turned oat of possession by virtue of a writ of habere facias issued upon this judgment, and applied for a writ of restitution with costs.

[370]*370Hamilton insisted that the tenant ought not to have costs.

By the Court. Let the writ of restitution issue with costs. He who is thus illegally turned out of possession, should have costs.

Hamilton then applied for leave to amend the affidavit, which was granted by the court.

Den ex dem. Ely v. Fen, 12 N.J.L. 322 (N.J. 1831).

Pincite

12 N.J.L. 322 (Den ex dem. Ely v. Fen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.