Den ex dem. Denny v. Smith

3 N.J.L. 711
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1810
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J.L. 711 (Den ex dem. Denny v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Den ex dem. Denny v. Smith, 3 N.J.L. 711 (N.J. 1810).

Opinion

By the Court.

The only question is, whether there is any difference between a declaration in ejectment and a declaration in any other case. In respect to amendments, there are cases in the English books that countenance the distinction urged by the counsel for the defendant, grounded on the idea that a declaration in ejectment, being an original proceeding, is in the nature of process, and having nothing to amend by, therefore not amendable; but we think that the fictitious nature of the action so far as it respects the [*] pleadings, the reason of the thing, the modern practice and liberal policy of courts of law, especially in our own State, is against the distinction; let the declaration therefore be amended, on payment of costs.

Rule allowed unanimously.

Cited in Den, Williamson v. Snowhill, 1 Gr. 23.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foremans v. Tamm
1 Grant 23 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1853)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.J.L. 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/den-ex-dem-denny-v-smith-nj-1810.