Demuth v. . Kemp
111 N.E. 1086, 216 N.Y. 757
This text of 111 N.E. 1086 (Demuth v. . Kemp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Demuth v. . Kemp, 111 N.E. 1086, 216 N.Y. 757 (N.Y. 1916).
Opinion
Judgment in each case affirmed, with costs, on the sole ground that the plaintiff has, failed to comply with sections 1871 and 1872 of the Code of Civil Procedure; no opinion.
. Concur: Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ. Not voting: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re the Estate of Senior
171 Misc. 904 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1939)
Matter of Kaplan v. Peyser
7 N.E.2d 21 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)
Canfield v. Security First National Bank
48 P.2d 133 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Spellman v. Sullivian
43 F.2d 762 (S.D. New York, 1930)
Rowe v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
132 Misc. 651 (New York Supreme Court, 1928)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 N.E. 1086, 216 N.Y. 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demuth-v-kemp-ny-1916.