Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Dempsey v. Schoen

Dempsey v. Schoen

11 A.D.3d 506, 782 N.Y.S.2d 650, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11968
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 12, 2004·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), entered March 8, 2003, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants and against her dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs claim that certain statements made by defense counsel deprived her of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review (see Ritz v Lee, 273 AD2d 291 [2000]; Lind v City of New York, 270 AD2d 315 [2000]), and, in any event, is without merit (see Lauter v Village of Great Neck, 231 AD2d 553 [1996]; Torrado v Lutheran Med. Ctr., 198 AD2d 346 [1993]; Zipkin v City of New York, 196 AD2d 865 [1993]).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are largely unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dempsey v. Schoen, 11 A.D.3d 506, 782 N.Y.S.2d 650, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11968 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

11 A.D.3d 506 (Dempsey v. Schoen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zipkin v. City of New York
196 A.D.2d 865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Torrado v. Lutheran Medical Center
198 A.D.2d 346 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Lauter v. Village of Great Neck
231 A.D.2d 553 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Lind v. City of New York
270 A.D.2d 315 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Ritz v. Lee
273 A.D.2d 291 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)