Dempsey v. New York State Thruway Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dempsey v. New York State Thruway Authority

99 A.D.2d 576, 471 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16811

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 1984

DocketClaim No. 66444; Claim No. 66445

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 A.D.2d 576 (Dempsey v. New York State Thruway Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dempsey v. New York State Thruway Authority, 99 A.D.2d 576, 471 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Cross appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Koreman, P. J.), entered June 6, 1983, which denied the New York State Thruway Authority’s motions for summary judgment dismissing the claims and granted claimants’ cross motions to amend their claims. The sole issue is whether claimants, members of the New York [577]*577State Police, were special employees of the New York State Thruway Authority on the date they allegedly sustained the personal injuries which form the basis for their negligence actions, as well as the derivative actions of their respective wives, against the authority. We affirm the order being appealed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Presiding Judge Harold E. Koreman of the Court of Claims. Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cross appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Koreman, P. J.), entered June 6, 1983, which denied the New York State Thruway Authority’s motions for summary judgment dismissing the claims and granted claimants’ cross motions to amend their claims. The sole issue is whether claimants, members of the New York [577]*577State Police, were special employees of the New York State Thruway Authority on the date they allegedly sustained the personal injuries which form the basis for their negligence actions, as well as the derivative actions of their respective wives, against the authority. We affirm the order being appealed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Presiding Judge Harold E. Koreman of the Court of Claims. Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.2d 576, 471 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dempsey-v-new-york-state-thruway-authority-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack