Dempsey v. Dempsey

205 Misc. 495, 131 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1954 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3322
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 21, 1954
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 205 Misc. 495 (Dempsey v. Dempsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dempsey v. Dempsey, 205 Misc. 495, 131 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1954 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3322 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A claim for unpaid alimony cannot be made the basis for recovery in an independent action (Maynard v. Maynard, 112 N. Y. S. 2d 813). The exclusive remedy is an application in the matrimonial action pursuant to the provisions of section 1171-b of the Civil Practice Act.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law, without costs, and motion to dismiss the complaint granted.

[496]*496(Resettled, January 21, 1954.)

On the court’s motion the decision on this appeal, dated January 18, 1954, is amended to read as follows:

A claim for unpaid alimony under a domestic matrimonial judgment or order, cannot be made the basis for recovery in an independent action (Maynard v. Maynard, 112 N. Y. S. 2d 813). The exclusive remedy is an application in the matrimonial action pursuant to the provisions of section 1171-b of the Civil Practice Act.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law, without costs, and motion to dismiss the complaint granted.

Walsh, Golden and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leitman v. Leitman
21 Misc. 2d 653 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Snow v. Snow
13 Misc. 2d 966 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Schwartz v. Schwartz
206 Misc. 548 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 Misc. 495, 131 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1954 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dempsey-v-dempsey-nyappterm-1954.