Dempsey v. Chief of Police of Somerville

958 N.E.2d 832, 461 Mass. 1003, 2011 Mass. LEXIS 1152
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided December 13, 2011·Published

Opinion

John Dempsey appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying, without a hearing, his petition for extraordinary relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. “In seeking relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, it was the petitioner's] burden to create a record — not merely to allege but to demonstrate, i.e., to provide copies of the lower court docket entries and any relevant pleadings, motions, orders, recordings, transcripts, or other parts of the lower court record necessary to substantiate [his] allegations — showing both a substantial claim of violation of a substantive right and that the violation could not have been remedied in the normal course of a trial and appeal or by other available means.” Gorod v. Tabachnick, 428 Mass. 1001, 1001, cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1003 (1998), and cases cited. The single justice neither erred nor abused his discretion, as the record neither substantiates Dempsey’s claims nor establishes any basis for extraordinary relief.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dempsey v. Chief of Police of Somerville, 958 N.E.2d 832, 461 Mass. 1003, 2011 Mass. LEXIS 1152 (Mass. 2011).

958 N.E.2d 832 (Dempsey v. Chief of Police of Somerville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gorod v. Tabachnick
428 Mass. 1001 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1998)