Demps v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Demps v. State

763 So. 2d 1267, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9387, 2000 WL 1021164

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 26, 2000

DocketNo. 1D99-1722

StatusPublished

This text of 763 So. 2d 1267 (Demps v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Demps v. State, 763 So. 2d 1267, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9387, 2000 WL 1021164 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Stanley Demps, appeals his conviction for armed robbery and his sentence as a prison releasee reoffender pursuant to section 775.082(8), Florida Statutes (1997). Appellant’s arguments regarding the constitutionality of section 775.082(8)' have been previously rejected. Turner v. State, 745 So.2d 351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), review granted (Fla. Feb. 3, 2000); Jackson v. State, 744 So.2d 466 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) review granted 749 So.2d 503 (Fla.1999); Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), approved 25 Fla. L. Weekly S463, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 766521 (Fla. June 15, 2000). Appellant’s argument that the prosecutor committed fundamental error during closing argument is without merit. Accordingly, the conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., MINER and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Stanley Demps, appeals his conviction for armed robbery and his sentence as a prison releasee reoffender pursuant to section 775.082(8), Florida Statutes (1997). Appellant’s arguments regarding the constitutionality of section 775.082(8)' have been previously rejected. Turner v. State, 745 So.2d 351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), review granted (Fla. Feb. 3, 2000); Jackson v. State, 744 So.2d 466 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) review granted 749 So.2d 503 (Fla.1999); Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), approved 25 Fla. L. Weekly S463, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 766521 (Fla. June 15, 2000). Appellant’s argument that the prosecutor committed fundamental error during closing argument is without merit. Accordingly, the conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., MINER and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

763 So. 2d 1267, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9387, 2000 WL 1021164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demps-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack