DEMOSS v. Dean MacHinery Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

DEMOSS v. Dean MacHinery Co.

260 S.W.3d 865, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1111, 2008 WL 3896005

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 26, 2008·No. WD 68842·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rod and Joni DeMoss appeal from a judgment in their favor in the amount of $0.00, after a credit for a confidential settlement amount was applied to a $1,000,000.00 jury verdict. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the *866 judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rod and Joni DeMoss appeal from a judgment in their favor in the amount of $0.00, after a credit for a confidential settlement amount was applied to a $1,000,000.00 jury verdict. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the *866 judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

DEMOSS v. Dean MacHinery Co., 260 S.W.3d 865, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1111, 2008 WL 3896005 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

260 S.W.3d 865 (DEMOSS v. Dean MacHinery Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related