DEMOSS v. Dean MacHinery Co.

260 S.W.3d 865, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1111, 2008 WL 3896005
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 26, 2008
DocketWD 68842
StatusPublished

This text of 260 S.W.3d 865 (DEMOSS v. Dean MacHinery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DEMOSS v. Dean MacHinery Co., 260 S.W.3d 865, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1111, 2008 WL 3896005 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rod and Joni DeMoss appeal from a judgment in their favor in the amount of $0.00, after a credit for a confidential settlement amount was applied to a $1,000,000.00 jury verdict. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the *866 judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Bh
260 S.W.3d 865 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 S.W.3d 865, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1111, 2008 WL 3896005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demoss-v-dean-machinery-co-moctapp-2008.