Demos v. Washington

365 F. App'x 342
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedFebruary 17, 2010
DocketNo. 09-4162
StatusPublished

This text of 365 F. App'x 342 (Demos v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Demos v. Washington, 365 F. App'x 342 (3d Cir. 2010).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM

On August 27, 2009, John R. Demos, Jr., an inmate in Washington State, filed in the District Court for the District of the Virgin Islands a pleading in which he requested, among other things, a declaratory ruling that he is being held in violation of Article 36(b)(1) of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. According to Demos, his incarceration violates the Vienna Convention because he owes allegiance to “foreign power[s]” — ie., “the Vatican, and the Rothschild family of France.” Compl. at 2. The District Court dismissed the matter for lack of jurisdiction. Demos appeals.

We have appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We will summarily affirm the District Court’s judgment because the appeal presents “no substantial question.” 3d Cir. IOP Ch. 10.6. Demos made no showing at all to establish that a Virgin Islands District Court has jurisdiction over his purported request for declaratory relief.1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
365 F. App'x 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demos-v-washington-ca3-2010.