Demos v. King County Superior Court

Supreme Court

Demos v. King County Superior Court

506 U.S. 997

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 30, 1992·No. No. 92-5973; No. 92-6082·Published

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Wash.; and

Ct. App. Va. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. Petitioners are allowed until December 21, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would deny the petitions for writs of certiorari.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sup. Ct. Wash.; and

Ct. App. Va. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. Petitioners are allowed until December 21, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would deny the petitions for writs of certiorari.

Demos v. King County Superior Court, 506 U.S. 997 (1992).

Pincite

506 U.S. 997 (Demos v. King County Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.