Demos v. King County Superior Court

Supreme Court

Demos v. King County Superior Court

506 U.S. 997

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 30, 1992

DocketNo. 92-5973; No. 92-6082

StatusPublished

This text of 506 U.S. 997 (Demos v. King County Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Demos v. King County Superior Court, 506 U.S. 997 (1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Wash.; and

Ct. App. Va. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. Petitioners are allowed until December 21, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would deny the petitions for writs of certiorari.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sup. Ct. Wash.; and

Ct. App. Va. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. Petitioners are allowed until December 21, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would deny the petitions for writs of certiorari.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

506 U.S. 997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demos-v-king-county-superior-court-scotus-1992.