Demorest v. Eastman

59 N.H. 65
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1879·Published

Opinion

Stanley, J.

The defendants had the right to rescind, and having notified the plaintiff to that effect, and offered to return the goods, no action can now be maintained against them to recover the price.

Exception overruled.

Foster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Demorest v. Eastman, 59 N.H. 65 (N.H. 1879).

59 N.H. 65 (Demorest v. Eastman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.