Demopulos v. Baton Rouge City Police Department
This text of 79 F. App'x 55 (Demopulos v. Baton Rouge City Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Brenda Demopulos appeals the denial of her motion for judgment as a matter of law and, alternatively, for a new trial following a jury verdict in favor of the defendants in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit. She has, however, not provided this court with a trial transcript.
Because Demopulos challenges the sufficiency of the evidence adduced at trial, it is impossible for us to entertain the merits of her appeal absent a trial transcript, and *56 her appeal must be dismissed. See Richardson v. Henry, 902 F.2d 414, 416 (5th Cir.1990).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 F. App'x 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demopulos-v-baton-rouge-city-police-department-ca5-2003.