Demopulos v. Baton Rouge City Police Department

79 F. App'x 55
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 21, 2003
Docket03-30392
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 79 F. App'x 55 (Demopulos v. Baton Rouge City Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Demopulos v. Baton Rouge City Police Department, 79 F. App'x 55 (5th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Brenda Demopulos appeals the denial of her motion for judgment as a matter of law and, alternatively, for a new trial following a jury verdict in favor of the defendants in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit. She has, however, not provided this court with a trial transcript.

Because Demopulos challenges the sufficiency of the evidence adduced at trial, it is impossible for us to entertain the merits of her appeal absent a trial transcript, and *56 her appeal must be dismissed. See Richardson v. Henry, 902 F.2d 414, 416 (5th Cir.1990).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Demopulos v. Baton Rouge City Police Department
541 U.S. 1051 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 F. App'x 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demopulos-v-baton-rouge-city-police-department-ca5-2003.