Demons v. State
577 So. 2d 702, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3094, 1991 WL 50115
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 1991·No. No. 90-0283·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
We find that the judgment and conviction should be affirmed in all respects; however, we find error in the trial court’s sentencing of the defendant as a habitual offender on count II without providing specific reasons therefor.
[703]*703We reverse the sentence as to count II only and we remand for resentencing on this count. The trial judge should state with specificity the reasons for sentencing any defendant as a habitual offender. Williams v. State, 532 So.2d 1341 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Demons v. State, 577 So. 2d 702, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3094, 1991 WL 50115 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
577 So. 2d 702 (Demons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Demons v. State
614 So. 2d 47 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)