Democratic Central Committee v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission

988 F.2d 1239, 300 U.S. App. D.C. 281
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 30, 1993
DocketNos. 21865, 24398, 24415 and 24428
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 988 F.2d 1239 (Democratic Central Committee v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Democratic Central Committee v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, 988 F.2d 1239, 300 U.S. App. D.C. 281 (D.C. Cir. 1993).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the motion of Security Trust Company, N.A., (the “Trust Company”), acting as Escrow Agent/Depositary for the account of the Washington Metropolitan Area Riders’ Fund for the entry of Judgment and other relief against D.C. Transit System, Inc. (“Transit”) on the claim of the Trust Company involving defaulted promissory notes payable by Transit to the Trust Company in the face amounts of $4,500,000.00 and $4,700,000.00 respectively (“the notes,” copies attached); and

Upon the determination by the Court that the dispute in this litigation, which requires a ruling by this Court, arises under and is related to the February 26, 1990 Order of the Court with respect to the Compromise Agreement and the claim by the Trust Company for judgment against Transit for sums that Transit presently owes the Trust Company under the terms of the notes, which were due on July 14, 1992 and which were not then paid and which remain in default and unpaid; and the Court by its Order of February 26, 1990 having “retain[ed] jurisdiction of all matters in all subject cases ... and ... to resolve any and all disputes arising under or relating to this [the compromise] settlement and with respect to all subject litigations”; and Transit having alleged and admitted to such jurisdiction in its answer of December 21, 1992 to the amended complaint of the Trust Company in Security Trust Company, N.A. v. D. C. Transit System, Inc., Civil Case No. 92-CA12235, Superior Court of the District of Columbia, Civil Division; and upon the Response by Transit to the February 18, 1993 Order of the Court to Show Cause why judgment should not be entered- against Transit in favor of the Trust Company in the amount of $4,976,124.79 with interest from February 2, 1993; and upon the Affidavit of Frederick W. Clark; and upon the arguments of counsel; and upon consideration of the terms of the notes herein before referred to; and upon all the files and records herein; it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, by the Court, pursuant to the retained jurisdiction cited above, that judgment is hereby entered against D.C. Transit System, Inc. in favor of Security Trust [282]*282Company, N.A. acting as Escrow Agent/Depositary for the account of the Washington Metropolitan Area Riders’ Fund established by the February 26, 1990 Order of the Court, in the amount of $4,976,124.79,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
988 F.2d 1239, 300 U.S. App. D.C. 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/democratic-central-committee-v-washington-metropolitan-area-transit-cadc-1993.